Good news for charity trustees in the Kids Company High Court Decision.

The High Court has today ruled against the Official Receiver in its case for disqualification brought against the directors of the charity “Kids Company”, together with its CEO Camila Batmanghelidjh.

This is good news for those who are trustees / directors of charitable companies, as well as charity trustees more generally.

The Court decided that although the trustees / directors of a charitable company are subject to the same duties of other companies, the fact that “Kids Company” was a charity could not be ignored, and so reaffirmed the historical benevolence shown by the Court to charity trustees where there has been no dishonesty or intentional breach of duty.  

The Official Receiver had sought to argue that the trustees / directors were responsible for financial mismanagement, in that they had allowed the charity to operate an unsustainable business model. The primary purpose of an application to disqualify directors, as made by the Official Receiver here, was identified as being to protect the public.

The Court was of the opinion that the public, however, did not need any protection from the trustees / directors of “Kids Company”, who were described in the judgment as “a group of highly impressive and dedicated individuals who selflessly gave enormous amounts of their time to what was clearly a highly challenging trusteeship”.

Disqualification of any of the “Kids Company” trustees was unwarranted, the Court was “wholly satisfied”. It also decided that Camila Batmanghelidjh was not a de facto director, but that even if she had been such, no disqualification order would have been made against her in the circumstances.

The Court also noted that there was a risk that disqualification proceedings based on “wide ranging but unclear allegations of incompetence rather than any want of probity” were likely to discourage individuals from becoming charity trustees.

This is a judgment that will provide a great deal of comfort to the sector, given that there are, no doubt, many charity trustees at present being forced to make difficult financial decisions on behalf of their charities.

Similar Articles

Charity Commission new gu... The commission has published new guidance for charity trustees about fundraising from the public, CC20. The guidance sets out 6 key principles to help trustees comply with
Richmond Group of Chariti... Research commissioned by the Richmond Group of Charities shows that charities can add value to the health and care system in a number of ways – which
Prevention of fraud ̵... You can take this preventative action now:  make sure charity software has up-to-date virus protection (though it will not always prevent you from becoming infected) 
Issues for trustees consi... Marie Stopes International  has been warned by the Charity Commission that its work faced being “undermined” over the decision   to award its CEO a bonus equivalent to
Charities and Brexit The charity sector is expected to lose £200k as a result of the UK’s exit from the European Union from grants and contracts from Europe. There will
Justice Denied Miscarriages of justice and long delays in the criminal justice system are becoming more common because a growing number of people are having to represent themselves in
Good news for charity tr... The High Court has today ruled against the Official Receiver in its case for disqualification brought against the directors of the charity “Kids Company”, together with its CEO Camila
New rules disqualifying f... From 1 August 2018, new rules extend the criteria disqualifying certain individuals from acting as trustees or holding senior management positions in charities. The Charity Commission has
Welcome to our blog stay tuned for more information.
Blenheim Palace granted c... Blenheim Palace has been registered with the Charity Commission  as the “Blenheim Heritage Foundation” with objects including restoring and preserving the site for the public benefit and

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.